Accessibility links

Breaking News

Wider Europe

Arkady Dvorkovich, president of the International Chess Federation, is among the Russian individuals who had sanctions against them lifted by the EU. (file photo)
Arkady Dvorkovich, president of the International Chess Federation, is among the Russian individuals who had sanctions against them lifted by the EU. (file photo)

Welcome to Wider Europe, RFE/RL's newsletter focusing on the key issues concerning the European Union, NATO, and other institutions and their relationships with the Western Balkans and Europe's Eastern neighborhoods.

I'm RFE/RL Europe Editor Rikard Jozwiak, and this week I am drilling down on two issues: What was removed from the latest EU sanctions on Russia, and Brussels' four pillars of security guarantees for Ukraine.

please wait

No media source currently available

0:00 0:10:26 0:00

Briefing #1: What The EU Didn't Include In Its Latest Russia Sanctions

What You Need To Know: The European Union finally passed its 20th sanctions package on Russia on April 23, two months after the fourth anniversary of the country's full-scale invasion of Ukraine when the package initially was supposed to be adopted.

Hungary had held up the approval but the resumption of Russian oil flowing to the Central European country last week and the impending change of government in Hungary after the ruling Fidesz party's big electoral loss on April 12 paved the way for a sudden green light by all 27 EU member states. But that didn't stop outgoing Hungarian Prime minister Viktor Orban and his Moscow-friendly government from altering some of the more hard-hitting measures initially proposed by the European Commission.

Deep Background: The first proposal from early February, seen by RFE/RL, included a trio of high-level Russian personalities involved in various sports federations. Those were removed and not listed in the adopted sanctions package due to a wish by Budapest not to target people involved in any type of sports.

The trio were Arkady Dvorkovich, president of the International Chess Federation (FIDE); Stanislav Pozdnyakov, former president of the Russian Olympic Committee (ROC); and Mikhail Mamiashvili, president of the Russian Wrestling Federation.

The proposal noted that Dvorkovich's reelection as head of FIDE in "2022 was welcomed by the Kremlin as a 'victory' for Moscow" and that he in this position "publicly supported the annexation of Crimea and called occupied Ukrainian cities 'new territories' of the Russian Federation."

The document also notes that Pozdnyakov during his reign in the ROC "made a unilateral decision to include the regional sports organizations under the Ukrainian National Olympic Committee's authority as its members, namely the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, the Zaporozhye region, and the Kherson region."

The reason for listing Mamiashvili includes that "he is a prominent figure within Russia's state-controlled sports system and is closely affiliated with key representatives of the Russian Government. He maintains close personal and professional ties with the highest levels of Russian leadership, including President Vladimir Putin."

The interesting thing to follow now is whether the incoming Hungarian government will reconsider the inclusion of these names when the next Russia sanctions package is proposed later this summer.

Several EU officials that RFE/RL have been in touch with say that their capitals will try to push the European Commission to re-table this trio, as well as religious figures such as Patriarch Kiryl, which Fidesz previously had struck off the proposed blacklists.

Drilling Down

  • Not all the watering down, however, was done by Hungary. The initial headline item of the 20th package was a so-called maritime service ban on all Russian oil products that would prevent EU economic operators from providing services to any vessel transporting these products from Russian ports.
  • This would have removed the current oil price cap, imposed by the Group of Seven (G7), by completely stopping EU vessels from transporting Russian oil while non-EU boats could still continue but would not be able to rely on EU port services or insurance.
  • But the final text, however, states that for such a move to really happen there needs to be prior agreement in the G7 and the so-called Price Cap Coalition, an informal group consisting of all EU member states, the G7, and Australia.
  • EU member states such as Cyprus, Greece, and Malta with a big commercial seafaring sectors were never too keen on the EU imposing this ban on its own and with soaring energy prices due to the monthslong closure of the Strait of Hormuz, several EU member states are currently reluctant to also target Russian oil to further drive-up energy costs for domestic consumers.
  • Perhaps the biggest new thing with these sanctions was Brussels' willingness to finally start hitting third countries that the bloc identified as helping Russia with sanctions circumvention. For the first time ever the club used its anti-circumvention instrument, introduced in 2023, to target Kyrgyzstan.
  • The instrument focuses on sector-specific export bans with Brussels imposing such a prohibition of two items going from the EU to the Central Asian country: computer-controlled CNC machines that cut, drill, and shape material, as well as radio equipment. Both items can be used for drone production and have been reexported from Kyrgyzstan to Russia in very high numbers in recent years.
  • But the original draft also listed companies in other countries that disappeared in the final adopted package. This included Kulevi port of Georgia that initially was included for having serviced vessels of the Russian shadow fleet and the Armenian OJSC Unibank for having traded with sanctioned Russian banks.
  • Both were eventually removed from the final list after the governments of the respective countries provided updated information to the European Commission that they no longer were engaged in activities that prompted their inclusion. The Azerbaijani Yelo Bank, proposed for blacklisting in early February, was however sanctioned.
  • Three Tajik banks, Dushanbe City Bank, Spitamen Bank, and the Commerce Bank of Tajikistan, all sanctioned by the EU in November 2025, were also removed after Dushanbe proved they no longer helped Moscow with sanctioned crypto-asset services.


Briefing #2: The 4 Pillars Of EU Security Guarantees For Ukraine

What You Need To Know: While the war in Ukraine rages on, the European Union is still planning on what security guarantees it can offer Kyiv, both in case there finally is a cease-fire and final peace deal but also other, smaller measures in case the war predictably rumbles on.

The most obvious European security is of course the pledge to have "boots on the ground" to safeguard a cease-fire. This is the business of individual countries of the Franco-British-led Coalition of the Willing, and most of those boots will be committed by Paris and London.

But the EU is also planning its own security guarantees. The most obvious one is of course eventual Ukrainian membership of the bloc, but despite wishes from Kyiv that process will still take years.

Deep Background: Instead, Brussels is basing its guarantees on three pillars with a fourth being designed. The first is the so-called military pillar and includes monetary assistance to the Ukrainian armed forces of both lethal and nonlethal equipment.

In this pillar you also have the European Union Military Assistance Mission in support of Ukraine (EUMAM), located in both Germany and Poland and functional since late 2022. As of early this year, this mission has trained nearly 90,000 Ukrainian officers on EU soil and is likely to be extended beyond the expiration of the current mandate in November.

The second pillar, known as the "security pillar", has another EU mission in Ukraine, EUAM. Since 2014, this mission aims to reform the civilian security sector in the country so it will meet EU standards in areas such as policing and criminal justice and will continue to be invested in for a foreseeable future.

The same is true for the third pillar, known as the "industry pillar." This one is about merging the Ukrainian and the European defense industries. The key here is the EU's SAFE instrument, the bloc's 150-billion-euro defense fund that encourages joint procurement both between various EU countries and especially with Ukraine.

Drilling Down

  • Now, the EU's diplomatic corps, the EEAS, has sent out a discussion paper to the 27 EU member states about a potential fourth pillar that they named "Shared Stability," which comprises a set of concrete activities to be launched already during the ongoing war.
  • The paper, seen by RFE/RL, points out that this pillar should tackle both internal and external threats that Ukraine is facing now beyond the actual war. The internal threats include "conflict-driven vulnerabilities that may lead to increased societal tensions, stemming from war-related grievances, particularly among vulnerable groups such as war veterans" but also other potential threats such as large-scale population movements, organized crime, trafficking and proliferation of small arms.
  • The external threats still come from Russia and its proxies, but rather than direct military attacks on the country, the EU believes Moscow and other players will hit Ukraine with cyberattacks, foreign malign interference, and "disinformation campaigns aimed at undermining Ukraine's stability and test Europe's resolve."
  • These things are of course happening even now, but EU officials that RFE/RL have been in touch with believe these activities likely will continue or even be increased during peace times.
  • The paper suggests that more financial support from the bloc's budget and member states should be directed already now to the reintegration of veterans, "leveraging their capacities and war experience to the benefit of Ukraine's security and stability such as military training and the EU's long-term security."
  • Don't rule out that the EU also will be more active going forward in helping Ukraine fight cyberthreats and disinformation going forward, similarly to what Brussels did with Moldova during its parliamentary elections last year and will do with Armenia later this year as a new EU mission to counter Russian activities will be set up there.
  • Other activities highlighted in the paper include financial support to ensure the safety of stockpiled ammunition and explosives, fund de-mining efforts and establish an "OPCW (The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons) attribution mechanism for the Russian use of chemical weapons in Ukraine."


Looking Ahead

There is plenty of news related to Armenia this week, starting with a European Parliament debate on the South Caucasus country on April 28. The chamber will also vote on a resolution supporting Yerevan two day later, and early next week the country will host leaders from most European countries when there is a summit of the European Political Community, followed by a first ever EU-Armenia summit.

That's all for this week! Feel free to reach out to me on any of these issues on X @RikardJozwiak, or on e-mail at jozwiakr@rferl.org.

Until next time,

Rikard Jozwiak

If you enjoyed this briefing and don't want to miss the next edition subscribe here .

Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan shakes hands with EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas in Brussels on April 14.
Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan shakes hands with EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas in Brussels on April 14.

Welcome to Wider Europe, RFE/RL's newsletter focusing on the key issues concerning the European Union, NATO, and other institutions and their relationships with the Western Balkans and Europe's Eastern neighborhoods.

I'm RFE/RL Europe Editor Rikard Jozwiak, and this week I am drilling down on two issues related to Armenia: the first-ever EU-Armenia summit and the bloc's new mission to the South Caucasus nation.

please wait

No media source currently available

0:00 0:09:32 0:00

Briefing #1: The First-Ever EU-Armenia Summit

What You Need To Know: Armenia has become the European Union's closest ally in the South Caucasus. While Georgia continues to drift away from the bloc and Azerbaijan remains an important partner in terms of energy imports but little else, it is now Yerevan that Brussels is truly betting on in that region.

The European Union has already made it clear it wants to counter Russian influence in the upcoming Armenian parliamentary elections on June 7, and several European officials have told RFE/RL they see it as the most important vote in the bloc's immediate neighborhood this year. The very fact that the EU is setting up a new mission (see below) in the country to counter foreign interference shows the club's intent.

Another clear indication of how highly Brussels currently values Yerevan is the first ever EU-Armenia summit taking place in the Armenian capital on May 5, which both European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and President of the European Council Antonio Costa are set to attend.

This comes just a day after the city hosts the summit of the European Political Community (EPC), bringing most European leaders a country that rarely gets international political attention.

Deep Background: Getting its own summit with the EU is quite a feat for the small South Caucasus republic. This is normally only reserved for really big international players such as China, India, or the United States; close and friendly neighbors like Moldova, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom; or regional blocs and groupings such as ASEAN, the African Union, or the six non-EU nations of the Western Balkans.

The summit itself will be mostly symbolic. The draft summit declaration, seen by RFE/RL, sketches out as much. There is nothing about a potential future EU membership of Armenia -- an idea that the current government has been toying with in recent years. Instead, it simply states that the "EU reaffirms its steadfast commitment to further strengthen its relations with Armenia and to support Armenia's resilience, reform agenda, and long-term development, bringing Armenia closer to the European Union."

The text also notes that leaders at the summit will discuss the geopolitical situation in both Iran and Ukraine. On Armenia's fraught relations with its neighbor Azerbaijan, there is not too much apart from a line stating that "we reaffirm our strong support for peace, security, connectivity and prosperity in the South Caucasus, and commend the efforts to further institutionalise the bilateral peace process with Azerbaijan and to ensure the final signature of the peace treaty."

Drilling Down:

  • Interestingly, there's no mention of Russia in the document, even though it is likely that a line such as "Armenia's future must be determined freely and democratically by its citizens without external pressure" was probably penned with Moscow in mind.
  • While not pushing Armenia to align with EU sanctions on Russia, Brussels is keen for the country to step up when it comes to preventing circumvention of the restrictive measures imposed on Moscow.
  • The paper states that "We agree to continue our effective cooperation to counter sanctions circumvention, especially concerning the trade in dual use and sensitive battlefield items, including preventing the misuse of Armenia's financial sector in this regard."
  • No new EU cash for Yerevan is specified in the paper, which still is referencing the 270 million euros foreseen for an EU growth plan for the country and the 2.5 billion euros Yerevan could get under the bloc's Global Gateway strategy, which is Brussels' answer to China's Belt and Road Initiative of investment in developing countries.
  • Similarly, there are no new commitments to Armenia's armed forces with Brussels so far having dedicated 30 million in nonlethal aid in the last few years under the so-called European Peace Facility (EPF). There are, however, indications from EU sources RFE/RL have been in touch with that more cash will soon be offered by the EU within this program.
  • The declaration also states that "The EU and Armenia are committed to enhance their relationship in the field of security and defence, including through the dedicated annual consultations."
  • On other specific investments, there is a mention of the "possible Black Sea Electricity Submarine cable," a project that has been mentioned before by Brussels but hasn't commenced. There is also the development of a roadmap to decommission the country's only nuclear power plant, known as Metsamor, slightly outside Yerevan.
  • On visa liberalization, one of Armenia's main aims since starting a so-called visa liberalization dialogue with Brussels in 2024, there is "significant progress" with the aim from both sides still being that Armenian citizens could travel to most EU countries without visas by the end of the decade.


Briefing #2: The EU's New Mission To Armenia

What You Need To Know: EU foreign ministers have given a green light to a new civilian mission to Armenia on April 21 that will help Yerevan with hybrid threats such as foreign election manipulation, cyberattacks, and illicit political funding over a two-year period starting in the coming months.

The mission, which will be called the European Union Partnership Mission in the Republic of Armenia (EUPM Armenia), was first requested by the South Caucasus nation in December. After several assessments in Brussels and Armenia, the bloc's ambassadors unanimously voted in favor of the proposal to establish the mission last week.

Deep Background: EUPM Armenia will essentially replace another EU mission in Armenia, called EUMA, that finishes its four-year mandate at the start of 2027 having been created in 2023.

EUMA, however, had a completely different mandate, being created to contribute to stability in the border areas of Armenia and via patrolling and reporting support normalization efforts between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

While EUMA had over 200 people posted both in Yerevan and along the border to Azerbaijan, the new mission is expected to just have 20-30 people, mostly working in close cooperation with national authorities in the capital.

EUPM will have no links to Azerbaijan even though one of the previous EU documents related to the mission, seen by RFE/RL, stated that Brussels will "continue its outreach to Azerbaijan to explain the purpose of the EU's support to Armenia and the need to avoid negatively impacting the ongoing peace process."

Drilling Down:

  • While not stated directly in the proposal to be approved by the ministers, seen by RFE/RL, it is clear Russian interference in Armenia is the main concern for the mission, notably the upcoming parliamentary elections in Armenia on June 7.
  • According to several EU diplomats speaking under the condition of anonymity, the EU hopes to copy what it sees as the success in the parliamentary elections in Moldova last year in which pro-Brussels forces retained power.
  • While not sending a fully fledged mission to Chisinau then, the bloc did provide staff to ministries to expose Russian disinformation related to the vote.
  • The mission is also set to help in later local elections and in the potential constitutional referendum that might come after the national vote. That plebiscite would be part of the current peace deal with Azerbaijan, with Baku claiming the current Armenian Constitution contains territorial claims to Azerbaijan.
  • Concretely, the proposal states that the mission of EUPM "shall enhance the resilience of Armenia in the field of hybrid threats through the provision of strategic advice as well as operational level advice and support to relevant security sector agencies, in line with a whole-of-government approach and in close coordination with other like-minded actors."
  • According to the document this includes providing strategic advice to relevant Armenian ministries and agencies "for countering hybrid threats, notably Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI) and cyber, as well as illicit financial flows in the electoral and political context."
  • In a previous document by the EU foreign policy corps, the European External Actions Service (EEAS), the need to counter the Kremlin's influence in Armenia was stated clearly, with one of the reasons for the mission being that it "should be aimed clearly at reducing and mitigating Russia's destabilizing activities."
  • It also warned that "Russia has intensified its coercive posture toward Armenia amid Yerevan's gradual reorientation toward the EU, exploiting Armenia's deep economic dependency and the fragile regional security environment." It added that if Brussels didn't held the country, "The EU would miss a historic opportunity to enable regional actors to free themselves from Moscow's embrace at a moment of Russian weakness in the region."


Looking Ahead

The focus in Brussels this week will very much turn to Cyprus as the Mediterranean island will host EU leaders for an informal summit on April 23-24.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will address the leaders via videolink, but the main discussion point will be Iran and how European nations can contribute to the opening of the Strait of Hormuz and to discuss measures to lower the spiraling energy costs in the bloc due to the blockade.

That's all for this week. Feel free to reach out to me on any of these issues on X @RikardJozwiak, or on e-mail at jozwiakr@rferl.org .

Until next time,Rikard Jozwiak

If you enjoyed this briefing and don't want to miss the next edition subscribe here .

Load more

XS
SM
MD
LG