Accessibility links

Breaking News

Wider Europe

Sorry! No content for 9 October. See content from before

Tuesday 8 October 2024

Calendar
October 2024
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2

Welcome to Wider Europe, RFE/RL's newsletter focusing on the key issues concerning the European Union, NATO, and other institutions and their relationships with the Western Balkans and Europe's Eastern neighborhoods.

I'm RFE/RL Europe Editor Rikard Jozwiak, and this week I'm drilling down on two big issues: A new EU sanctions mechanism targeting malign Russian actions and Albania's recent progress on joining the EU.

Briefing #1: Expanded Sanctions To Target Russian Hybrid Threats

What You Need To Know: Ambassadors from the 27 European Union member states on October 2 agreed to a new sanctions mechanism targeting Russian hybrid actions. Broadly, "hybrid" here means actions carried out on behalf of a state to undermine the functioning of another country, so, for example, trying to impact elections or targeting critical infrastructure. It is expected that the new measures will be formally agreed by the bloc's finance ministers when they assemble in Luxembourg on October 8.

The new sanctions regime is, according to the EU diplomats I have spoken to, meant to plug some of the gaps in the current restrictive measures on the Kremlin.

Essentially, the EU has two types of sanctions regimes: geographical and horizontal. Brussels has mostly used geographical sanctions -- which focus on a particular location or political entity -- to hit Russia since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In short, it targets the Russian government, its citizens and entities, such as companies, that the bloc deems to have undermined the territorial integrity of Ukraine.

In this area, Brussels has gone quite far -- introducing all sorts of economic sanctions on various Russian industries, such as oil, diamonds, and coal, just to mention a few, as well as imposing visa bans, and asset freezes on around 2,300 people and firms.

Then, on top of that, there are horizontal sanctions that are not limited to one country and that target people and companies around the globe. In this area, the bloc has sanctions pertaining to terrorism, cyberattacks, the use of chemical weapons, and human rights abuses. Russian citizens are blacklisted under these horizontal sanctions as well.

Deep Background: Earlier this year, the EU created something of a mix between a geographical and a horizontal sanctions regime -- creating a blacklist of people committing human rights abuses in Russia. The sanctions largely targeted people responsible for the jailing and mistreatment of Russian opposition figures such as Vladimir Kara-Murza, who was released from a Russian prison last month in a major prisoner swap between Russia and the West, as well as Aleksei Navalny, who died in mysterious circumstances in a Russian prison in February.

The sanctions just agreed by the EU are a similar mix. But, actually, they go a step further. The text, prepared by the legal service of the Council of the EU, one of the bloc's main decision-making bodies, and seen by RFE/RL, notes that the EU is free to impose asset freezes and visa bans on people or entities that are "responsible for, implementing, supporting, or benefiting from actions or policies by the government of the Russian Federation, which undermine or threaten democracy, the rule of law, stability or security in the union or in one or several of its member states, in an international organization, or in a third country."

So, in a sense, it covers not only Russian citizens, but also other nationals working for Russia -- and it involves not only actions taken in the European Union but worldwide. Brussels could, in other words, now go after a wide spectrum of Russian activities, not just confined to a narrow geographical area (such as Ukraine) or very specific actions (such as human rights abuses).

The two big challenges going forward, however, will be defining the hybrid actions, or "destabilizing activities," as the official document puts it, and then proving that Russia is responsible.

It will be up to the member states to present compelling evidence that the bloc's legal service can approve. This is likely to prove tricky, especially given that all 27 member states must sign off. It is also unclear how far back the sanctions can go -- or if potential new listings will only be able to concern recent actions.

Drilling Down

  • The legal text lists eight different examples that are sanctionable. The first one is perhaps the most wide-ranging: "the obstruction or undermining of the democratic political process," which includes trying to tamper with elections or challenging the constitutional order of a country.
  • It will likely be hard to prove that Russia is effectively interfering in an EU member state. However, the new sanctions may open up the possibilities of the bloc punishing Russians attempting to interfere in vulnerable third countries. Two cases in point: both Georgia and Moldova are holding crucial elections this month. Georgia is holding parliamentary elections on October 20.
  • The second example listed in the EU's legal document concerns the planning, directing, or engaging in violent demonstrations. Diplomats I spoke to said that this could apply to a situation such as recent riots in the United Kingdom, which began in July after the fatal stabbing of three young girls in the northern English town of Southport. Disinformation helped fuel the riots, which developed strong anti-Muslim and anti-migrant sentiments. If it was proven that Russians were fanning the protests online, they could be targeted if something similar were to occur.
  • The third sanctionable offense is activities that "silence, intimidate, coerce, or exact reprisals against persons critical of the actions or policies of the Russian Federation." So, for example, that could apply to something like the hammer and tear-gas attack in Lithuania earlier this year on Leonid Volkov, a former close aide to Navalny.
  • Then there is "coordinated information manipulation." A good example of the type of activity this could apply to would be the Prague-based Voice of Europe website that both the Czech Republic and the EU placed sanctions on earlier this year for running a Russian influence operation.
  • Another sanctionable offense would be the targeting of critical infrastructure in EU member states. This includes crimes such as damaging undersea cables, but could also include arson attacks on buildings and public transportation.
  • What the EU called the "instrumentalization of migrants" could also be targeted, with examples seen at the borders of Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland, where the Belarusian authorities, often supported by Russia, have been accused of flying in migrants, mainly from Asia, and then sending them to the borders of nearby EU countries.
  • The last two items on the EU's list are activities that Wagner and other Russian-sponsored mercenary groups would most likely carry out. The EU would target actions such as "instigating or facilitating an armed conflict in a third country" and exploiting such armed conflicts through "the illicit exploitation or trade of natural resources and wildlife in a third country." That is a reference to illegal ivory or diamond trading.

Briefing #2: Albania Decouples From North Macedonia And Moves Closer To The EU

What You Need To Know: Albania will finally open its first five European Union accession chapters on October 15. This comes after Tirana and EU member Greece buried the hatchet in September over a spat that had significantly slowed down the country's membership bid.

For four years, Albania's membership bid has been tied to North Macedonia's. No longer, as Albania is making progress while North Macedonia is still struggling due to its ongoing dispute with Bulgaria.

The five chapters Albania will open next week all belong to a cluster that Brussels calls the "fundamentals." These are, essentially, the EU negotiating chapters a country opens first and then closes last, and there are many EU laws that need to be "transposed" -- to use the EU's lingo -- into the national law of the candidate countries. Two of the five "fundamentals" chapters -- No. 23 dealing with judiciary and fundamental rights and No. 24, which concerns justice, freedom, and security -- are seen as the crucial ones. Many of the EU hopefuls are grappling with corruption and weak legal systems, and Brussels wants to address that before they join the club.

Deep Background: The green light for Albania came at a meeting of the bloc's Europe ministers on September 24, when the Greek minister noted that Athens was satisfied with Tirana moving ahead in the enlargement process.

A day later, Cyprus, which normally aligns with Greece, also flagged that, to its mind, Tirana was good to go. The breakthrough actually came earlier in September, when Fredi Beleri, the ethnic Greek mayor of the Albanian seaside town of Himare, was released from an Albanian prison. Beleri was arrested and imprisoned last year over a vote-buying scheme. It was a move that soured relations between Athens and Tirana, with Greek officials demanding his release and accusing the Albanian government of politically motivated persecution.

In June, while still in prison, Beleri was elected to the European Parliament as a candidate for the Greek ruling center-right New Democracy party. He was released from prison for a few days in July to be sworn in at the Strasbourg-based chamber.

It is clear now that North Macedonia, once considered the "star pupil" of the EU hopefuls in the Western Balkans, even changing its official name, is stuck. It has failed to comply with Bulgaria's request to amend its constitution so that the country's ethnic Bulgarian minority is mentioned as one of the founding peoples of North Macedonia.

This change, requested in 2022 as a prerequisite to launch accession talks, needs a two-thirds majority in the Skopje parliament, something that, so far, has remained elusive. And it appears to be even less likely to happen any time soon, as the center-right government that has been in power since this summer is less inclined to make compromises with Sofia.

Bulgaria, on the other hand, is preparing for parliamentary elections at the end of the month, so no big political decisions are really in the works. In fact, most Bulgarian parties are in agreement that the ball is firmly in Skopje's court.

Drilling Down

  • The fact that North Macedonia and Albania are now decoupled -- after both received the go-ahead to start accession talks in 2020 and both symbolically started accession talks on the same day in 2022 -- is galling for Skopje. Especially as North Macedonia, back in 2020, was seen as a front-runner and some of its officials, albeit in private, were complaining about Albania "hanging on to Skopje's coattails" to get closer to the EU.
  • The decoupling is worth watching as it could shine some light on what might happen with Ukraine and Moldova. The two countries are also formally coupled on their current EU accession paths, both becoming official EU candidate countries in 2022 and both symbolically opening accession talks on the same day in June of this year.
  • Back in the day, grumbles could be heard in Kyiv that Moldova was just managing to get ahead thanks to the efforts of Ukraine. The question is whether they'll remain coupled next year when both are expected to officially open negotiations chapters -- the same five "fundamentals" as Albania will open now.
  • To open accession chapters, all 27 EU member states must give a green light. And this is certainly not a given yet, at least in the case of Ukraine. Poland will hold the rotating presidency of the Council of the EU in the first half of 2025. It has recently been embroiled in a spat with Ukraine over the 1943 Volhynia massacre of ethnic Poles by Ukrainian nationalists, with Warsaw demanding a proper exhumation and burial of the victims. There is no indication yet that Poland will use Ukraine's enlargement process to get its way, but don't rule it out completely.
  • And then, of course, there's Hungary, which has been a vocal critic of Ukraine's future EU integration and has insisted on Kyiv giving more rights to the ethnic Hungarian minority in the country. Budapest has previously indicated that they would like to decouple Moldova and Ukraine.

Looking Ahead

The European Parliament plenary this week could be interesting. On October 8, the Strasbourg chamber will debate the upcoming elections in Moldova and Georgia and vote on resolutions on both the following day. With Georgia's government showing some authoritarian tendencies of late, and with crucial elections coming up, Tbilisi could well be criticized in the resolution.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban will also address the chamber on October 9. He was initially slated to do so in September, but severe floods in Central Europe forced him to cancel.

Later this week, on October 10-13, U.S. President Joe Biden will travel to Germany. He will first go to the capital, Berlin, and then to the U.S. military base of Ramstein in the western part of the country to chair the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, which coordinates weapon deliveries to Kyiv. Look out for any possible news on allowing Ukraine to use Western arms systems to hit deep into Russia.

That's all for this week! Feel free to reach out to me on any of these issues on X @RikardJozwiak, or on e-mail at jozwiakr@rferl.org.

Until next time,

Rikard Jozwiak

If you enjoyed this briefing and don't want to miss the next edition, subscribe here.

Former Dutch Prime Minister and incoming NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte (file photo)
Former Dutch Prime Minister and incoming NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte (file photo)

Welcome to Wider Europe, RFE/RL's newsletter focusing on the key issues concerning the European Union, NATO, and other institutions and their relationships with the Western Balkans and Europe's Eastern neighborhoods.

I'm RFE/RL Europe Editor Rikard Jozwiak, and this week I'm drilling down on two big issues: the leadership vacuum at the OSCE and what Mark Rutte will have on his plate at NATO.

Briefing #1: Stalemate At The OSCE

What You Need To Know: The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) is currently leaderless and rudderless. As of September 4, the four top positions in the organization -- the secretary-general, the director of the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), the high commissioner on national minorities, and the representative on freedom of the media -- have been run by so-called "officers-in-charge" with no executive powers. The mandates for the four roles have expired with no new appointees in place.

This after Malta, the chair of the OSCE for 2024, spent the entire summer trying to find four leaders that the 57 OSCE member countries from Europe, Asia, and North America could agree on. The current stalemate could potentially drag on through the fall, leaving one of the few political organizations in which all European states still meet in complete disarray.

Deep Background: The whole process started in early May, with Malta calling for candidates for the positions. Thirteen candidates were put forward for the four roles by the deadline at the end of that month. Then Valletta founded a "Group of Friends of the OSCE Chairmanship," which consisted of representatives from Austria, Finland, Liechtenstein, North Macedonia, Turkmenistan, and the United Kingdom, to help sift through the candidacies and see if some sort of consensus could be found.

After asking the candidates about issues such as the future role of the OSCE, Russia's continued presence in the organization, and the war in Ukraine, the group presented a package in early August referred to as the "chair's proposal." In this, Igli Hasani, the current Albanian foreign minister, would be the new secretary-general; Dutch diplomat Christophe Kamp would take over the ODIHR; the former Georgian state minister for reconciliation and civic equality, Ketevan Tsikhelashvili, would take over as the new high commissioner on national minorities; and the post of representative on freedom of the media was suggested for Jan Braathu, a Norwegian diplomat and current head of the OSCE mission in Kosovo.

But, so far, it's not been plain sailing. In an internal document authored by Malta and seen by RFE/RL, it was noted in September that, "while the overwhelming majority of participating states expressed their readiness to join consensus, the chair took note at the Preparatory Committee meeting of 22 August 2024 that full agreement had not yet been reached."

The paper outlined that the main issue was a so-called "alternative proposal" pushed jointly by Greece and Turkey. In this possible lineup, Braathu and Tsikhelashvili remain in the same positions, but instead of Hasani and Kamp, the Ankara and Athens duo are proposing former Turkish Foreign Minister Feridun Sinirlioglu as secretary-general and Greek diplomat Maria Telalian for the ODIHR job.

This proposal notes that, "in response to the requests from both [Turkey] and Greece, and in recognition of the political significance of their joint candidacies...the chair is providing the opportunity for participating states to consider the following alternative package." After that, Valletta called for an informal meeting at the ambassadorial level in Vienna, where the organization is based, on September 23 to discuss both packages and get some clarity.

Drilling Down

  • Clarity is not what they got. While the "chair's proposal" still enjoys "wide support," according to diplomats I have spoken to, the Greek-Turkish proposal also has its supporters.
  • This proposal is presented as a "unity and compromise" deal, bringing together two historical rivals. Cyprus, which normally votes against anything Turkish, backed down at the September 23 meeting, clearing one potential roadblock.
  • The EU is split. Normally, EU countries, which represent nearly half of the OSCE's membership, try to maintain a united front, but this time, Malta and Greece are in different corners -- with many member states apparently caught in the middle.
  • The impasse has also opened another can of worms. Candidates proposed earlier, who didn't get much initial support, are suddenly back on the table, such as Bosnian Dunja Mijatovic, who is eyeing the ODIHR job.
  • Enter Russia. What surprised some during the process was that there weren't any clear Moscow-backed candidates for any of the four positions -- something of an anomaly, as the Kremlin had previously been rather active in putting names forward.
  • Russia does, however, reject the idea of having Tsikhelashvili as the high commissioner on national minorities, especially as she worked as a minister to reintegrate Russian-occupied South Ossetia and Abkhazia into Georgia. The problem here is that there are only two other known alternatives for the minorities job. One is Hungarian diplomat Rita Izsak-Ndiaye, whom the Baltic states, Poland, and Ukraine find unpalatable due to Budapest's close links to Moscow. The other candidate, Canadian John MacGregor, is currently the head of the OSCE center in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan.
  • MacGregor would be a popular choice, but if he were to replace Tsikhelashvili in the "chair's proposal," the four top positions would be all male. Given that gender balance is a priority for the OSCE, this is not a small obstacle.
  • The upshot is that we're back to square one with no clear timelines. The issue could easily drag on up to the annual OSCE ministerial meeting in Malta on December 5-6. At this meeting, other issues need to be discussed, such as the organization's future chairs. Finland will take over in 2025, but ideally the chairs for 2026 and 2027 should also be settled in December and discussion on that has not even started.

Briefing #2: Mark Rutte's To-Do List At NATO

What You Need To Know: Today, October 1, Mark Rutte takes over from Norway's Jens Stoltenberg as NATO's secretary-general. Rutte, the longest-serving prime minister in Dutch history, is very much seen as a "continuation candidate." Like Stoltenberg, who served a decade at the helm of the military alliance, Rutte is known for having a talent for striking difficult political compromises. He enjoys widespread support among key member states, not in the least for his supposedly dry humor that can grease the wheels of diplomacy.

It will be something of a soft start for the Dutchman. On October 17-18, the Brussels headquarters will host the annual fall meeting of NATO's 32 defense ministers. Subsequently, the foreign ministers will descend upon the Belgian capital on December 3-4. However, it is not anticipated that those ministerial meetings will yield much.

5 Things To Know About New NATO Boss Mark Rutte
please wait

No media source currently available

0:00 0:00:59 0:00

At first, Rutte is expected do a fair bit of traveling to key NATO capitals. It's a long while away, but he'll also have to start preparing for the NATO summit on June 24-26, 2025, in his hometown, The Hague. In order to cement his position within the military organization, it's important that the summit is a success. At the top of his agenda, there are three topics he is expected to tackle: NATO's collective defense, support for Ukraine, and a new Russia strategy.

Deep Background: None of these things are new; in fact Stoltenberg spent much of his time grappling with the same things. The Norwegian was, according to diplomats I have spoken to, always pushing for more ambitious language in NATO communiques on Ukraine. He was also reportedly key in securing a Ukraine command center in the German city of Wiesbaden to coordinate security assistance to Kyiv.

In the future, Rutte will be responsible for ensuring that the organization transitions from a somewhat American enterprise to one that includes a greater number of NATO allies. He will also likely be committed to continuing the alliance's support for war-torn Ukraine.

On that, he enjoys close relations with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and, as Dutch prime minister, he helped get F-16 fighter aircraft sent to Ukraine, secured stronger EU economic sanctions on Moscow despite Dutch dependency on trade, and helped move Ukraine along the path toward EU membership.

One of the things he may have to deal with in the short term is the tricky question of whether Ukraine will get an invitation to join NATO. There is hope in Ukraine that the United States -- partly as a result of outgoing President Joe Biden's foreign policy -- will consent to this soon.

Diplomats I have spoken to at NATO are less sure about this, however. Germany, Hungary, and Slovakia are still not convinced Ukraine belongs in the military alliance, plus there are other European states that also aren't sure. There has been no real movement on this issue from what was agreed at this summer's Washington summit, one diplomat told me, referring to the agreed line that "we will be in a position to extend an invitation to Ukraine to join the alliance when allies agree and conditions are met."

Drilling Down

  • There is also the bread-and-butter issue of collective defense. There are gaps, notably on the alliance's eastern flank. One thing for the alliance to address is to improve the so-called rotational model, in other words to get more air-defense systems on the vulnerable eastern flank.
  • In the end, it comes down to one thing: the need for more spending on defense. That 23 out 32 NATO allies spend 2 percent of their gross domestic product on defense is celebrated in Brussels, but as one country's ambassador to the alliance told me: 2 percent spending on defense is not adequate and what's needed is something closer to 3.5. The question is if Rutte, who was known as a prudent spender as prime minister, can cajole others to loosen the purse strings.
  • And then there is Russia. Revising NATO's Russian policy will be high on the agenda moving toward the summit in The Hague next year. NATO already agreed at the Washington summit that "Russia remains the most significant and direct threat to allies' security." But the question is if NATO will go further, perhaps coming up with some sort of "containment policy," even though many don't like the Cold War-like association of that phrase.
  • And what of the NATO-Russia Council, which hasn't met since just before the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022? And what about the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act, which established political guidelines between the alliance and the Kremlin?
  • Given Rutte's penchant for compromise and his leadership of a country that is a member of both the EU and NATO, many expect (or at least, hope) that he can improve NATO-EU cooperation. Not so much, perhaps, from an institutional point of view, but rather informally, member to member. There continues to be deadlock between Cyprus (on the EU side) and Turkey (on the NATO side), which results in the blocking of deeper, formal joint ventures between the two institutions.
  • It could be that, for this, the stars are aligned. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen; her incoming foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas; and the new head of the European Council, Antonio Costa, are all ardent trans-Atlanticists. The same is true for Andrius Kubilius, the former Lithuanian prime minister and proposed European commissioner for defense.
  • Whatever happens, it's not going to be easy for Rutte. There will undoubtedly be issues with Hungary. Budapest was the last NATO member to give its approval for Rutte. Plus, the Dutchman and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban have clashed before, notably when Rutte pushed for some EU funds meant for Hungary to be frozen.
  • Rutte is sometimes known as a "Trump-whisperer" for his role in reportedly helping to convince Trump that it was the U.S. president's push that contributed to European allies ramping up defense spending. So if Trump does return to the White House, that relationship would be key.
  • Rutte will also need to pick his deputy. The two known candidates for the deputy secretary-general position are the former defense minister of North Macedonia, Radmila Sekerinska, and the former foreign minister of Bulgaria, Mariya Gabriel. Sekerinska is the presumed favorite, and there is also a possibility that former Croatian President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic could be in the running.
  • There is a desire within NATO that the top job goes to a woman and someone from the alliance's east. But as one NATO source told me: "We also wanted a woman from Eastern Europe as the UN secretary-general and ended up with a Portuguese man, Antonio Guterres, back in 2017."

Looking Ahead

An interesting case is coming up in the General Court of the European Union on October 2. It concerns a ban, in place since 2022, on EU firms providing legal advice to the Russian government, as well as companies established in the country. Some European bar associations are contesting these sanctions, and the ruling will give an indication of the true strength of the bloc's economic sanctions on Russia.

That's all for this week! Feel free to reach out to me on any of these issues on X @RikardJozwiak, or on e-mail at jozwiakr@rferl.org.

Until next time,

Rikard Jozwiak

If you enjoyed this briefing and don't want to miss the next edition subscribe here.

Load more

About The Newsletter

The Wider Europe newsletter briefs you every Tuesday morning on key issues concerning the EU, NATO, and other institutions’ relationships with the Western Balkans and Europe’s Eastern neighborhoods.

For more than a decade as a correspondent in Brussels, Rikard Jozwiak covered all the major events and crises related to the EU’s neighborhood and how various Western institutions reacted to them -- the war in Georgia, the annexation of Crimea, Russia’s support for separatists in eastern Ukraine, the downing of MH17, dialogue between Serbia and Kosovo, the EU and NATO enlargement processes in the Western Balkans, as well as visa liberalizations, free-trade deals, and countless summits.

Now out of the “Brussels bubble,” but still looking in -- this time from the heart of Europe, in Prague -- he continues to focus on the countries where Brussels holds huge sway, but also faces serious competition from other players, such as Russia and, increasingly, China.

To subscribe, click here.

RFE/RL has been declared an "undesirable organization" by the Russian government.

If you are in Russia or the Russia-controlled parts of Ukraine and hold a Russian passport or are a stateless person residing permanently in Russia or the Russia-controlled parts of Ukraine, please note that you could face fines or imprisonment for sharing, liking, commenting on, or saving our content, or for contacting us.

To find out more, click here.

XS
SM
MD
LG