Accessibility links

Breaking News

The Farda Briefing

This handout photo provided by Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) shows the launch of the Qaem-100 satellite launch vehicle.
This handout photo provided by Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) shows the launch of the Qaem-100 satellite launch vehicle.

Welcome back to The Farda Briefing, an RFE/RL newsletter that tracks the key issues in Iran and explains why they matter.

I'm RFE/RL correspondent Kian Sharifi. In this edition, I’m looking into the back-and-forth between Israeli and Iranian officials over whether Iran is advancing intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of threatening the United States.

What You Need To Know

Could Iran Target American Cities?: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has raised alarms about Iran’s missile ambitions, claiming Tehran is developing intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching the US East Coast with minimal enhancements. While Netanyahu’s warnings emphasize an emerging threat to American cities, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi rejects these assertions as unfounded, stating Iran’s longest-range missiles are limited to about 2,000 kilometers and serve purely defensive aims.

Calls Grow To Shut Women’s Prison: At least two inmates have died in Qarchak Prison, which is billed by Iranian media as one of the world’s largest women’s prisons. The deaths have reignited calls for the authorities to close the prison, which has long been a grim symbol of repression in Iran. RFE/RL’s Radio Farda spoke with activists who served time in Qarchak, with one describing the facility as “uninhabitable.”

Iranians Feel The Pinch As UN Sanctions Return: Videos showing young women riding motorcycles through the streets of Tehran have taken social media by storm this week amid a debate over Iran’s longstanding ban on issuing motorcycle licenses to women. Under current law, only men can obtain a license, leaving women who ride motorcycles without insurance coverage or legal protections. Lawmakers are now reviewing a new bill that could finally address the issue.

The Big Issue

President Masud Pezeshkian visits a defense and space achievements exhibition in Tehran, February 2
President Masud Pezeshkian visits a defense and space achievements exhibition in Tehran, February 2

How Long Is Too Long?

Benjamin Netanyahu reignited debate over Iran’s missile capabilities this week, claiming that Tehran’s latest missile developments could threaten major cities well beyond the Middle East.

Netanyahu stated Iran is working on intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) with a range of up to 8,000 kilometers -- enough to strike the US East Coast if the range is extended further.

But Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi swiftly dismissed the warnings, labelling them as “fabricated” and “imaginary.” He reiterated Iran’s stance that its longest-range missiles reach approximately 2,000 kilometers, targeting only regional adversaries such as Israel, and maintain that their program is strictly defensive in nature.

But conservative lawmaker Ahmad Bakhshayesh Ardestani contradicted Araqchi in an interview with a local news outlet.

Ardestani, who is a member of the parliament’s influential National Security And Foreign Policy Committee, claimed that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei “has lifted all restrictions” on the range of Iranian missiles.

Why It Matters: Though Iran formally denies pursuing nuclear armament for its ballistic missiles, a senior Iranian commander hinted this month that missile ranges may be extended further if future security concerns warrant it.

This follows strategic shifts after the Israel-Iran war in June, which saw launch sites pushed further east inside Iran, necessitating greater reach for future deterrence.

In a segment of a 2021 documentary released by the supreme leader’s office, Khamenei tells a small gathering that military leaders “wanted a range of four to five thousand kilometers, but I wouldn’t allow it; I told them not to build anything over 2,000 kilometers for now.”

When someone in the audience asked for the justification, Khamenei replied, “There’s a reason,” and added that the commanders continue to complain to him because he won’t lift the restriction.

What's Being Said: Netanyahu warned on during an interview with American conservative political commentator Ben Shapiro that Iran is developing ICBMs capable of putting “New York City, Boston, Washington, or Miami under their atomic guns.”

“Iran can blackmail any American city,” Netanyahu explained. “People don’t believe it. Iran is developing intercontinental missiles with a range of 8,000 kilometers; add another 3,000 and they can get to the East Coast of the [United States].”

Araqchi responded on X, writing that “Israel is now trying to make an imaginary threat out of our defense capabilities” and accusing Netanyahu of goading Washington into fighting “Israel’s Forever Wars.”

Expert Opinion: The United States and its allies remain deeply concerned that Iran’s space program may serve as a cover for developing long-range missile technology, including ICBMs. Tehran, meanwhile, insists its program is peaceful, focused solely on communications and research.

Farzin Nadimi, a senior fellow at The Washington Institute, recently told Radio Farda that Iran’s satellite launch vehicles (SLVs) could, with some modifications, be converted for use as ICBMs.

“Normally, it’s the other way around: you turn long-range missiles into SLVs,” Nadimi noted, reflecting the dual-use nature of the technology.

Iran has sent several satellites into orbit using vehicles like Zoljanah -- a hybrid-fuel, road-mobile rocket -- but with a mixed record: numerous launch failures show the technology is still maturing. Nadimi added that while it may be “impossible” right now to turn Zoljanah into a true ICBM, “it has the potential” for future adaptation.

That's all from me for now.

Until next time,

Kian Sharifi

If you enjoyed this briefing and don't want to miss the next edition, subscribe here. It will be sent to your inbox every Friday.

US President Donald Trump (right) and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shake hands at the conclusion of a joint press conference in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on September 29
US President Donald Trump (right) and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shake hands at the conclusion of a joint press conference in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on September 29

Welcome back to The Farda Briefing, an RFE/RL newsletter that tracks the key issues in Iran and explains why they matter.

I'm RFE/RL correspondent Kian Sharifi. In this edition, I’m looking into how hard-line media in Iran view US President Donald Trump's plan to end the Gaza war.

What You Need To Know

No Love For Trump’s Gaza Plan: Conservative media in Iran have ripped into US President Donald Trump’s detailed proposal to end the war between Israel and the US-designated Palestinian terrorist group Hamas. They insist the plan only benefits Israel and is really only meant to save Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Meanwhile, with the exception of a short comment from Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, Iranian officials have been noticeably quiet.

Iran Approves Harsher Espionage Law: Iran’s Guardian Council this week approved a new law imposing harsher penalties, including the death sentence, for espionage and collaboration with Israel, the United States, and other “hostile states.” The decision follows months of debate in parliament and comes just days after UN experts condemned a surge in executions, with over 1,000 people executed in 2025 alone -- the highest in at least 15 years.

Iranians Feel The Pinch As UN Sanctions Return: The UN reimposed “snapback” sanctions on Iran over the weekend. Despite Tehran calling the sanctions “illegal” and vowing endurance, inflation and cost of living are rising sharply for ordinary citizens. The sanctions include an arms embargo, ballistic missile restrictions, asset freezes, and travel bans, targeting Iran’s nuclear, missile, and military programs.

The Big Issue

Displaced Palestinians walk south as they flee Gaza City, following an Israeli evacuation order, amid an Israeli military operation, October 2
Displaced Palestinians walk south as they flee Gaza City, following an Israeli evacuation order, amid an Israeli military operation, October 2

Plan To ‘Bury’ Palestinian Statehood

Trump's Gaza plan, announced on September 29, is a 20-point proposal aimed at ending the war, securing the release of hostages, and setting a roadmap for Gaza's future governance and reconstruction.

The plan also obligates Hamas, an Iran-backed group which governs the Gaza enclave, to fully disarm and relinquish power. A transitional governing body of Palestinians, supervised by an international "Board of Peace" would then take responsibility for the territory.

The plan calls for the eventual transfer of governance to a reformed Palestinian Authority, laying the groundwork for a future Palestinian state—though this remains contentious with current Israeli leadership.

The proposal has drawn the ire of conservative media in Iran, which question its ability to bring lasting peace and claim its purpose is to benefit Netanyahu.

Young Journalists Club, an outlet affiliated with the state broadcaster, described the proposal as a “colonial project” meant to “bury the dream of a Palestinian state.”

The Tabnak news agency also cast doubt over the plan, writing, “Trump's plan for Gaza is not the start of a definite renaissance, but a diplomatic gamble whose economic promises are weighed against geopolitical realities.”

The hard-line Kayhan newspaper, whose chief editor is appointed by Iran's supreme leader, charged that Trump and Netanyahu “are looking to conquer Gaza and destroy Hamas under the guise of a ‘cease-fire’.”

Notably, the only official Iranian reaction has come from Araqchi, who told CNN the only sustainable plan for Gaza is one “which recognizes and respects the rights of Palestinians for self-determination.”

Why It Matters: On September 13, the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly voted to support a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Iran, which does not recognize Israel, abstained from the vote.

Tehran argued that the resolution “ignored the roots” of the conflict and unfairly blamed “both the occupier and the occupied.” It also opposed calls to disarm Palestinian “resistance groups,” including Hamas.

However, many within Iran criticized this abstention, saying Tehran missed an opportunity to advocate for Palestinians on the international stage, and warned that Iran’s hard-line stance could be counterproductive.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has long insisted that the conflict needs to be resolved through a referendum where only the “original inhabitants” of historic Palestine can participate.

What's Being Said: Mehrzad Boroujerdi, a professor of political science at the Missouri University of Science and Technology, told RFE/RL’s Radio Farda that Trump’s plan is “ambitious” and contains positive points.

“But the question is whether Hamas will agree to disarm and forego involvement in Gaza’s future governance,” he said. “The Palestinian Authority right now has little influence in Gaza.”

Critics of the plan in Iran insist that disarming Hamas is non-starter.

Hadi Borhani, an assistant professor at the University of Tehran, told the Iranian news website Khabar Online that the demand for Hamas to give its weapons is “a big problem” and that the people of Gaza have to decide who governs the enclave.

There have been no elections in the Gaza Strip since Hamas took power in 2007.

Expert Opinion: Boroujerdi speculated that after two years of war, “the people of Gaza” may be open to accepting Trump’s plan, but Hamas officials are unlikely to give in. “I would be surprised if they accepted it,” he added.

That's all from me for now.

Until next time,

Kian Sharifi

If you enjoyed this briefing and don't want to miss the next edition, subscribe here. It will be sent to your inbox every Friday.

Load more

XS
SM
MD
LG