Accessibility links

Breaking News

Wider Europe

Sorry! No content for 23 December. See content from before

Tuesday 17 December 2024

A Belgian soldier patrols a Christmas market in central Brussels. (file photo)
A Belgian soldier patrols a Christmas market in central Brussels. (file photo)

Welcome to Wider Europe, RFE/RL's newsletter focusing on the key issues concerning the European Union, NATO, and other institutions and their relationships with the Western Balkans and Europe's Eastern neighborhoods.

I'm RFE/RL Europe Editor Rikard Jozwiak, and, this week, I'm looking at the big decisions the EU will (and won't) be taking before the winter break.

Note to Readers: You can now listen to my briefings by clicking on the audio link below. We're actually using an AI version of my voice and would love to know what you think -- and, of course, what we can improve.

please wait

No media source currently available

0:00 0:12:02 0:00

The Briefing: Clearing The Decks Before The Winter Break

Normally, the week leading up to the winter holiday in the European Union is the busiest, with thorny decisions to be made before the year ends. Just look at last year, when EU leaders eventually gave Moldova and Ukraine the green light to start accession talks, granted Georgia candidate status, and approved a rather wide-ranging sanctions package on Russia. They also agreed to channel some previously frozen funds for Hungary while controversially failing to get Budapest's thumbs up for a 50 billion euro ($53 billion) package for Ukraine. (That package was eventually approved by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban in February).

This year's pre-holidays agenda looks rather uneventful in comparison. A new, puny sanctions package on Moscow was agreed to by EU ambassadors already on December 11, but it was more significant for the derogations -- EU speak for the various exemptions -- that came with it.

On Ukraine, It's Business As Usual

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy will attend the EU summit on December 19, but there is no big decision to be made on Kyiv. Compare the jubilant scenes in Tbilisi a year ago when Georgia received candidate status to what's happening now when the Georgian authorities are cracking down on people protesting the government's decision to halt EU talks. In fact, the way Brussels reacts to the increasingly hard-line leadership in Georgia will be one of the few things to look out for this week.

For Ukraine, the latest draft EU summit conclusions, seen by RFE/RL, "reconfirms the European Union's unwavering commitment to providing continued political, financial, economic, humanitarian, military, and diplomatic support to Ukraine and its people for as long as it takes and as intensely as needed. Russia must not prevail."

This is the line the bloc has stuck to for the entire year, and while there has been talk of negotiations with Moscow in the new year, the EU seems to be sticking to its "business as usual" approach to Kyiv. While there was plenty of Hungarian intransigence on financially supporting Kyiv last time around, everything is already set for 2025, as Budapest agreed in November to the G7-EU initiative of leveraging frozen Russian assets in the West to channel a 45 billion euro ($47 billion) loan to Kyiv. On top of that, another 12.5 billion euros will be coming directly from the EU's budget.

My understanding is that, during the summit, Zelenskiy will also push EU member states to ramp up defense production, preferably in direct cooperation with Ukraine's defense industry, and to provide Kyiv with air defense systems and drone interception capabilities.

On sanctions, the summit conclusions draft simply notes that "the European Union remains ready to step up pressure on Russia, including by adopting further sanctions." Early next year, the European Commission will most likely come up with a proposal for a new package, the 16th since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. This will come as Poland assumes the rotating six-month presidency of the Council of the EU on January 1, and Warsaw has signaled its intention to prioritize more restrictive measures against Moscow.

By looking at the most recently approved 15th package, the signs are not particularly encouraging.

No new sectors of the Russian economy were targeted; instead, Slovakia got a derogation to continue to import Russian oil via the Druzhba pipeline for another six months.

The biggest fight around this package was Latvia and Lithuania pushing France, Germany, and Italy to disinvest quicker from the Russian market. However, nothing was agreed on this and there is only a reference in the latest sanctions package that it is risky doing business in Russia and that it's time to wind down EU companies working there.

For Albania And Montenegro, The Race Is On...

The special EU-Western Balkans summit in Brussels on December 18 -- between the leaders of Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia and their EU counterparts -- isn't likely to be particularly eventful.

The draft declaration, seen by RFE/RL, contains no new elements, with EU officials telling me that the main "deliverable" is largely symbolic, simply consisting of the fact that the region's leaders are meeting EU officials ahead of the regular EU summit.

The "Balkan Six" already had dinner with the new president of the European Council, Antonio Costa, and the freshly appointed EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, earlier in December. That the pair had only just started their new roles is an indication of the high priority that has been given to the region in Brussels.

The key day, for at least some of the Western Balkan countries, will instead be a few days before the summit. On December 17, the EU member states' Europe ministers will approve the annual EU enlargement conclusions and participate in a couple of Intergovernmental Conferences (IGCs).

Albania will participate in one of those meetings, during which it will open two EU accession chapters related to foreign policy. Tirana already opened negotiations on five chapters in October and has real momentum behind its membership bid.

The other IGC, which took place on December 16, was for Montenegro.

Montenegro has already opened negotiations on all 33 policy chapters, but, for the first time since 2017, Podgorica closed three chapters -- on information society, industrial policy, and intellectual property.

This means that EU laws in these spheres have now been transposed into Montenegrin law. Given that, in 12 years of negotiations with Brussels, Montenegro has only managed to close three other chapters, this step is rather significant. EU diplomats have been hinting recently that Montenegro could potentially join the bloc this decade.

...While Serbia Is Blocked

There was a big push to have a third IGC this week and to open a number of negotiation chapters with Serbia as well. This push came mainly from Budapest, big EU member states such as France and Italy, as well as the European Commission, which has suggested that Belgrade is ready to proceed with its EU integration ever since its annual enlargement report in October.

However, the three Baltic states, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, blocked the process due to Belgrade's continued nonalignment with the EU's sanctions policy on Russia. Additionally, the Netherlands withheld approval, citing Serbia's failure to meet benchmarks on some of the chapters they were supposed to open.

The issue of Serbia's progress is likely to resurface in the first half of 2025, and, by then, it might very well be linked to the opening of negotiating chapters with Ukraine and Moldova. Kyiv and Chisinau are expected to officially start the EU accession process under the Polish presidency, even though Hungary has indicated that it may not give its consent to Ukraine, arguing that the ethnic Hungarian minority in the country is still being discriminated against. Don't be surprised to see a grand bargain in 2025 where both Serbia and Ukraine get the green light.

Addressing The Crisis In Georgia

The situation in Georgia will feature prominently this week. The draft EU summit conclusions on the South Caucasus republic are rather weak, simply noting that the European Council "reiterates its serious concerns regarding the course of action taken by the Georgian government, which runs counter to the values and principles upon which the European Union is founded."

The commission also "regrets" the Georgian government's decision to suspend the country's EU accession process until 2028. There is also strong condemnation of the recent violence against Georgians protesting the government's decision to put EU accession on ice, with the text making clear that "the Georgian authorities must respect the right of freedom of assembly and of expression and refrain from using force. All acts of violence must be investigated and those responsible held accountable."

The text isn't harsher due to both Hungary and Slovakia not wanting to take a hard line against the leadership of Georgia, who both countries see as their ally.

This support for the ruling Georgian Dream party also suggests that any EU sanctions against the Georgian leadership -- including against Bidzina Ivanishvili, the party chairman and deeply influential billionaire -- are likely to be ruled out, following the measures taken by Estonia and Lithuania earlier in December Don't rule out, though, that more individual EU member states will follow Estonia and Lithuania and take their own measures.

There has been some discussion in Brussels about the possibility of suspending visa liberalization for some Georgian passport holders -- notably those holding diplomatic passports. That would be largely a symbolic move, as most officials have "normal" passports as well.

But the proposal is being considered for two reasons.

Firstly, you don't need unanimity to impose this measure. Instead, a qualified majority of 55 percent of the EU member states, representing 65 percent of the bloc's total population, is all that's required.

Secondly, such a proposal is seen as much "fairer" than going for a general visa liberalization suspension, which would impact the entire Georgian population.

The issue of suspending visas for Georgian diplomats was discussed at length back when the bloc's foreign ministers met in Brussels on October 16. No real decision was made, but the European Commission, which would initiate the whole suspension process, received political guidance from member states to look into the matter more closely and come back with a proposal -- something that can happen later this week.

The European Commission has actually already opened up the pathway for visa suspension, when, on December 6, it published its annual report on the visa suspension mechanism.

This report covers what the countries enjoying visa liberalization in the Western Balkans, as well as Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine, are doing in the area of justice, home affairs, and fundamental rights in order to maintain their status. And it is fair to say that Georgia received the worst review of all countries assessed this year.

The report notes that "there are ongoing reflections on the possible activation of the visa suspension mechanism in relation to certain categories of persons" and adds that "[Georgia] needs to take further urgent action to address the Commission's recommendations, particularly in the area of the protection of fundamental rights."

The report refers especially to Georgia's controversial "foreign agent" law and anti-LGBT measures, stating that they both "infringe upon human rights and fundamental freedoms, in particular the rights to freedom of association, expression, and privacy."

But that is far from the only complaint, even though it is the most serious one.

The report also says that Georgia made no progress on visa policy alignment with the EU, instead agreeing to a visa-waiver agreement with China earlier in 2024. It also bemoans the lack of a national anti-corruption strategy or action plan and Georgia's failure to set up an asset recovery office.

Looking Ahead

There is an interesting ruling coming up in an EU court on December 18. The Moldovan fugitive oligarch Ilan Shor and his colleague Marina Tauber are challenging the bloc's sanctions imposed on them in 2023 for undermining the sovereignty and political stability of Moldova.

The case is worth watching because the court in October ruled against the same type of sanctions that were targeting Vlad Plahotniuc, another Moldovan oligarch. (Plahotniuc does, however, remain sanctioned by the bloc, as the ruling concerned an older sanctions period, and the EU prolonged the restrictive measures before the court ruling.) But a win for Shor and Tauber would make another Moldova sanctions rollover in 2025 more complicated.

That's all for this year! I wish you all the best for the holiday season, and thank you very much for all your support and feedback throughout 2024!

Feel free to reach out to me on any of these issues on Twitter @RikardJozwiak, or on e-mail at jozwiakr@rferl.org.

All the best,

Rikard Jozwiak

If you enjoyed this briefing and don't want to miss the next edition -- which will come on January 14, 2025 -- please subscribe here.

A damaged Russian tank in a forest in the Kharkiv region, northeastern Ukraine
A damaged Russian tank in a forest in the Kharkiv region, northeastern Ukraine

Welcome to Wider Europe, RFE/RL's newsletter focusing on the key issues concerning the European Union, NATO, and other institutions and their relationships with the Western Balkans and Europe's Eastern neighborhoods.

I'm RFE/RL Europe Editor Rikard Jozwiak, and this week I'm looking at NATO's perspective on the winter war in Ukraine and its efforts to counter the growing hybrid threats posed by China and Russia.

Note to Readers: You can now listen to my briefings by clicking on the audio link below. We're actually using an AI version of my voice and would love to know what you think -- and, of course, what we can improve.

please wait

No media source currently available

0:00 0:11:13 0:00

Briefing #1: NATO Prepares For A Difficult Ukrainian Winter

What You Need To Know: The mood on Ukraine at the NATO foreign affairs ministerial in Brussels on December 3-4 can be described in one word: grim. Just listen to the normally chirpy NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte: "This could be Ukraine's most difficult winter since 2022." Or Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha, who told the press that the situation "is really very challenging. And I am [being] very diplomatic now."

A senior NATO official, speaking anonymously because they weren't authorized to speak on the record, made clear to me what has been apparent for a while now -- that Russia is increasing the tempo of its offensive operations on the battlefield, pushing back Ukraine on several fronts. And the rapid gains are now rather considerable, with NATO estimating that Russia could be advancing up to 10 kilometers a day. (Earlier this year, that would have been more like 10 meters a day.)

Russia's rapid advance has been made possible by taking advantage of flat, open terrain, for example around Pokrovsk in the Donetsk region, before the worst of the winter mud arrives. The NATO official noted that Russia had "a significant advantage when it comes to equipment, ammunition, and manpower" -- on the latter, being able to call on 30,000 new troops every month. Add to this the increased air strikes on critical Ukrainian infrastructure, which keeps the country's air defenses busy and ramps up psychological pressure on the civilian population.

It should, however, be noted that not all is going swimmingly for Moscow. Russian forces will soon run into more entrenched Ukrainian positions. And from September through November, Russian casualties were an estimated 1,500 a day, whereas Ukraine's casualty rates are thought to be around half that.

Deep Background: In one aspect, it's clear what Ukraine needs: more men and additional air defenses. On the first issue, most people I spoke to at NATO headquarters in Brussels agreed with Washington's recent assessment that Kyiv should lower the recruitment age to 18 from the current 25, while also conceding that this would be a tough political decision.

On air-defense systems, Ukraine has been the one doing the asking, with Foreign Minister Sybiha requesting 19 new ones to cover critical infrastructure. While nothing was promised, diplomats at the ministerial told me that they expected that at least some systems would be delivered soon.

Another predictable disappointment for Ukraine at the ministerial meeting was that elusive NATO invitation. In fact, the military alliance hasn't moved on that since the Vilnius NATO summit in 2023. There simply isn't unanimity on the issue so, at the moment, the best Ukraine gets is the same well-rehearsed phrases about Ukraine's "irreversible NATO path" and "a bridge to membership," a reference to individual members' security pacts with Kyiv and the alliance's mission to train Ukrainian soldiers.

But this fall there has been a renewed Ukrainian charm offensive, with some in Kyiv hoping that, at the ministerial meeting, they might even get an invite. Apparently the hope was that the two key skeptics -- the United States and Germany -- would be more amenable as the former will have a new administration in January and Germany will hold federal elections in February.

The Ukrainian foreign minister even brought along a copy of the Budapest Memorandum, agreed 30 years ago in 1994 and signed by the United States and Russia, which was meant to guarantee Ukrainian territorial integrity in return for the former Soviet republic giving up its nuclear arms.

The optimism, however, appeared misplaced. Already, ahead of the ministerial, senior NATO diplomats briefed the media that the alliance still remains divided on the issue of Ukraine joining the alliance and that such a "monumental" decision wasn't on the table.

The ministers were unmoved by Ukraine's persuasion. Speaking anonymously as they weren't authorized to go on the record, several NATO officials told me that the idea of Ukraine's membership was nipped in the bud during a dinner devoted to the war. The issue will certainly come up again, most likely in the run-up to NATO's next summit in The Hague in June 2025.

Drilling Down:

  • What appeared to be on the minds of most diplomats and ministers is the potential for some kind of negotiation with Russia in 2025. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy hinted in a recent interview with the British broadcaster Sky that he would give up some of the occupied territory for NATO membership.
  • Rutte didn't speculate on this but simply noted that NATO had to "make sure that Ukraine, whenever it decides to enter into peace talks, will do so from a position of strength." Few would argue that Ukraine is in such a position now.
  • In the meantime, various other ideas are floating around. Several NATO diplomats I spoke to confirmed media reports coming out of London and Paris that the two countries would be prepared to contribute with boots on the ground in a postwar Ukraine -- essentially as peacekeepers monitoring some sort of cease-fire.
  • There have also been suggestions that Poland and the Baltic countries could join such a peacekeeping mission. This, I was told by diplomats, wouldn't be coordinated by NATO but rather between various NATO capitals and would show the United States that the European allies could play an active and useful role.
  • The million-dollar question is how keen Russia is to make a deal. And many at NATO HQ think: not very much . Or as one senior NATO official told me: "We don't think [Russian President Vladimir Putin] is serious about negotiations. He may be willing to talk, but as long as he believes that he is winning, there is no incentive for negotiations. And he continues to believe that time is in his favor."

Briefing #2: How NATO Can Defend Against Hybrid Attacks

What You Need To Know: While NATO is thinking a lot about Ukraine, the military alliance is increasingly grappling with the growth of hybrid attacks on its 32 members, coming from Russia and China but also Iran and North Korea. At last week's meeting of foreign ministers in Brussels, a senior NATO official, speaking anonymously because they weren't authorized to speak on the record, mentioned the "sustained, ongoing daily attacks against NATO countries," which included cyberattacks, political interference, attacks on critical infrastructure such as undersea cables, and sabotage. One recent example is the damage to fiber-optic communications cables in the Baltic Sea, which some believe was sabotage.

Since 2016, NATO has stated that hybrid attacks against any of its members can trigger Article 5 -- meaning such an attack can be considered an act of aggression that must be repelled with the help of all allies. The threshold for Article 5 is sky-high; in fact, it's only been triggered once in NATO's 75-year history, after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States that subsequently led to the war in Afghanistan.

NATO officials readily admit that hybrid attacks are tricky because they are not like conventional warfare. NATO traditionally deals with the protection of external borders, whereas hybrid attacks tend to happen inside allied countries -- and often on a regular basis. It is that ambiguity that makes everything tricky.

Many of the attacks, whether physical or online, are carried out by what appears to be private individuals although they can be traced back to Russia. It is too murky and hard to present absolutely conclusive evidence that attributes blame. And blaming whoever is responsible is not always advantageous. One senior NATO official told me: "What we don't want is that everything everywhere is attributed to Russia. It makes them look bigger and it creates anxiety. Always attributing is not necessarily a smart thing."

Deep Background: Many of these hybrid attacks also target private companies; for example, telecom operators that own undersea cables. And while NATO officials say that those private concerns are increasingly coming to NATO for help as they don't have the capacity to secure their infrastructure and respond, it's a huge gray area and, in many ways, unprecedented.

That Europe is vulnerable here is an understatement. Look at the damage to the Balticconnector gas pipeline last year or the two fiber-optic cables recently severed in the Baltic Sea. In the first instance, Beijing admitted that a Chinese-flagged vessel was responsible but claimed it was an accident and refused to further cooperate in the investigation. In the case of the fiber-optic cables, various national probes are under way, although once again much of the evidence points to a Chinese boat being responsible.

Drilling Down:

  • So what can NATO do? After the debate among foreign ministers on December 4, there was agreement to share more intelligence, conduct more naval exercises, and increase the alliance's presence in the Baltic Sea.
  • But NATO officials are also well aware of the magnitude of the task. There are more than 1 million kilometers of undersea cable in NATO waters and about 50,000 ships in European waters at any one time. It is simply impossible to patrol everything, even the most critical infrastructure nodes.
  • But NATO could become better at preventing things happening in the first place, making it harder for actors with ill-intent to get away with things -- or what one NATO official termed "to deny deniability." NATO is stepping up the use of artificial intelligence to spot unusual trends and track suspicious ships.
  • Alliance members are trying a variety of defensive measures to protect cables, including using sensors to monitor data, burying them under concrete, and even laying down multiple dummies. Much of this was not done before, as the infrastructure was designed for peacetime.
  • NATO is now busy working on a new hybrid-threat strategy ahead of The Hague summit in June 2025-- a document that will guide the alliance's actions on the issue going forward. The last one, from 2015, is outdated, with one senior NATO official noting: "It didn't envision this threat level. Malign cyberactions are on a different level now, the number of threat actors is bigger and the overall threat level much higher"

Looking Ahead

On December 12, the EU's home ministers will finally give Bulgaria and Romania the green light to join the Schengen zone by the start of 2025 -- 18 years after the two countries became members of the bloc. The pair already enjoys visa-free travel by air and sea as of March this year, but soon its citizens will be able to do so via land after the last holdout, Austria, agreed to lift its veto last month at a meeting in Budapest.

That's all for this week! Feel free to reach out to me on any of these issues on Twitter @RikardJozwiak, or on e-mail at jozwiakr@rferl.org.

Until next time,

Rikard Jozwiak

If you enjoyed this briefing and don't want to miss the next edition subscribe here.

Load more

About The Newsletter

The Wider Europe newsletter briefs you every Tuesday morning on key issues concerning the EU, NATO, and other institutions’ relationships with the Western Balkans and Europe’s Eastern neighborhoods.

For more than a decade as a correspondent in Brussels, Rikard Jozwiak covered all the major events and crises related to the EU’s neighborhood and how various Western institutions reacted to them -- the war in Georgia, the annexation of Crimea, Russia’s support for separatists in eastern Ukraine, the downing of MH17, dialogue between Serbia and Kosovo, the EU and NATO enlargement processes in the Western Balkans, as well as visa liberalizations, free-trade deals, and countless summits.

Now out of the “Brussels bubble,” but still looking in -- this time from the heart of Europe, in Prague -- he continues to focus on the countries where Brussels holds huge sway, but also faces serious competition from other players, such as Russia and, increasingly, China.

To subscribe, click here.

RFE/RL has been declared an "undesirable organization" by the Russian government.

If you are in Russia or the Russia-controlled parts of Ukraine and hold a Russian passport or are a stateless person residing permanently in Russia or the Russia-controlled parts of Ukraine, please note that you could face fines or imprisonment for sharing, liking, commenting on, or saving our content, or for contacting us.

To find out more, click here.

XS
SM
MD
LG